tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post418113573434645499..comments2013-08-29T11:34:52.226-07:00Comments on KABIR BEDI'S WORLD: WHY PARDON SANJAY DUTT?KABIR BEDI'S BLOGhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16288116214744865396noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post-18531991844617983452013-08-29T11:34:52.226-07:002013-08-29T11:34:52.226-07:00Italy loves you!
Italy loves you!<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post-35634676548194709382013-05-25T00:19:37.775-07:002013-05-25T00:19:37.775-07:00Kabir Bedi writes - " Guilt by association ha...Kabir Bedi writes - " Guilt by association has been the widespread perception among people who don’t dwell on the fine print.” Bedi, most educated Indians read the fine print. It is the utter hypocracy and double standards of people like you which is despicable, who like an ostrich will bury his head in the sand in the face of truth. Sanjay Dutt after having colluded with anti-nations to wreak havoc on our country got away from TADA citing the flimsy reason of “self defence”. Lesser criminals had to cool their heels under TADA who did-not have influential parents who can go begging asking for exceptions and waivers. This when there is evidence that he not only knew about the terror attacks that were to be perpetrated but also instigated his notorious friends to execute them swiftly. Besides, Bedi, let me tell you one thing, if any common man had been caught in the same act as Sanjay Dutt, he would definitely have to spend 12-15 years in jail, regardless of his intentions and the purpose of his actions.<br /><br /> Sanjay Dutt got away very lightly for his grave act of crime. But now the culprit and criminal has been tried to be projected as a victim by Kabir Bedi. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post-50317112931338762342013-05-24T09:03:58.749-07:002013-05-24T09:03:58.749-07:00Bedi's article is absolutely " emotional ... Bedi's article is absolutely " emotional gibberis". Check my comments on this issue which Bedi has conveniently ignored.Dev Sharmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00322299331930098377noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post-6679765009106395182013-05-24T09:00:09.845-07:002013-05-24T09:00:09.845-07:00I don’t agree AT ALL with this article by Kabir Be...I don’t agree AT ALL with this article by Kabir Bedi. On the cover, Bedi appears to sound very impartial and logical, but as expected, in a bid to mitigate the gravity of Sanjay Dutts’s crime, he conveniently ignores important facts and dimensions in this case. <br />In 1993, Dawood gang smuggled rifles and hand grenades into India and distributed among various underworld elements, a part of which was kept in Sanjay Dutts house. All the culprits who have been caught in this act, has been slapped under TADA. Even the woman Zaibunissa, who had only kept the bag of weapons in transit and had no links with the d-gang (unlike Sanjay Dutt who had proven links with D company) could escape TADA. Only Sanjay Dutt, the most high profile, escaped the TADA HOW ??? Sanjay Dutt’s father, Sunil Dutt, after failing to receive help from members of the political establishment, including the then Maharashtra Chief Minister Sharad Pawar, approached Shiv Sena supremeBalasaheb Thackeray. Thackeray then announced that he knew Sunil and his late wife Nargis Dutt personally and did not believe that any member of the family could be "anti-national". The Dutts publicly thanked Thackeray, and Sunil desisted from contesting consecutive elections to keep a promise to him. Other criminals who didn’t have high political connections had to suffer under TADA.<br />And now, the moot point is why did Sanjay Dutt procure AK-56, magazines and arm grenades from the Dawood gang in the first place. For SELF DEFENCE ??? Sanjay Dutt’s father was the MP at that time and he was already getting 24 hours police protection. Besides he had three licensed weapons. If Sanjay Dutt still wanted more security, he could have easily got VIP security.. What is the need to turn to notorious anti-social elements for protection?? And, AK-56 rifles and hand grenades are not used for protection. They are used to create blasts and kill in masses. M N Singh, Mumbai's Joint Commissioner of Police, who investigated the blasts, says: "The explanation doesn't cut any ice. One doesn't go running for help to gangsters for self-protection. There are government agencies to fall back on and in his case it was easy to get government help. As the son of Nargis and Sunil Dutt, a Congress MP, Sanjay could have asked the government for help.”<br /> In his first confessional statement, made to his father and Congress MP Sunil Dutt who wanted to know why he had been stashing deadly arms, Sanjay Dutt said: “Because I have Muslim blood in my veins. I could not bear what was happening in the city.” There is culpable evidence with CBI of the telephonic conversations between Sanjay Dutt and D-gang which reveal that Sanjay Dutt was well aware that D-gang was trying to launch terror attacks on our country. However, he did-not act like a responsible citizen and informed the police, in which case precious life and property could have been saved. He’s a traitor who aided the terrorists to carry their nefarious acts and stored ammunition in his house so that they could be used against the Indian population. For such a grave treacherous act, he got only 5 years imprisonment ??? <br /><br />Dev Sharmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00322299331930098377noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post-92195710392097203982013-05-01T23:41:47.560-07:002013-05-01T23:41:47.560-07:00You first reason is "What was the age of Sanj...You first reason is "What was the age of Sanjay Dutt "<br />Kabir Bedi’s article does not talk about Sanjay Dutt's age and does not reason Sanjay Dutt's age as a fact to pardon him. If Sanjay Dutt was 33, than your politicians who are way over 33 should not be making ANY mistakes. There should be a law stating that <br />“ no one above 33 years should commit a crime. If anything , that person should be ruined for the whole life “<br /><br />Instead of challenging the reasons in the article you have started with "emotional gibberis", reflecting your emotions; Jealousy and Hate.<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16486426566918671590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post-91793755707867715232013-04-16T05:13:38.717-07:002013-04-16T05:13:38.717-07:00With al due respect Mr. Bedi, but all you are writ...With al due respect Mr. Bedi, but all you are writing here is according to me is a complete 'emotional gibberis.<br /><br />What was the age of Sanjay Dutt when he had those sphisticated arms which our normal police dont have 12-14-18-25...??? 33 if m slightly correct.... And to answer your 'Concern' over his so called 'suffering' over the past two decades, i'd mlike to say had it not been Mr. Dutt and had it been any other normal - 'Aam aadmi' with those heavy charges do u actually feel that he'd be out on a bail for such a long time to to actually live a 'suffered' life of a star, getting married, having kids....??? Answer is NO.....!!! <br /><br />And the humiliation which you have mentioned here is just a farce as you yourself has never considered him as a criminal. May be because having AK -47 for 'self defence' is a pretty normal act in the society where you belong. But in a real Indian society we literally could land up in Jail for an indefinite period of time for possessing a 'Desi Katta'...!!! <br /><br /><br />You say that his careere has ended for 5 years, i say he was lucky enough to atleast get a chance to start it all over again. Normally people dont even have a 'Life' commiting a crime like this.<br /><br />Though it is immaterial to mention coz u r hell bound on making him a hero out of his conviction and making a mockery of the judicial system. I do love him as an actor but for the crime he committed and what possibly could have averted that henious blast he should be punished and ask for penance. That was not a juvenile act what he did and he should not be treated like one. Sumithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06965602570013900744noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post-68760640855531475132013-04-02T03:32:22.013-07:002013-04-02T03:32:22.013-07:00Mr. Bedi... a good argument indeed but read this I...Mr. Bedi... a good argument indeed but read this Indian Express Article to look at another perspective.<br />http://www.indianexpress.com/news/national-interest-because-we-forget/1095140/0Kanishahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05148739213285164784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post-29562967468912908412013-03-31T00:25:13.313-07:002013-03-31T00:25:13.313-07:00with gr8 respect will it not set a wrong precedenc...with gr8 respect will it not set a wrong precedence Mr. Bedi...hope u also refer n understand with d same vigor the circumstances with which rajiv gandhis convicts r jailed for more than 23 yrs for no wrong they hve committed. with due respect to u all these sounds to be a manufactured consent to justify a non justifiable a issueconvivialisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03046428700646743622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7742126840093466691.post-11538231200911257682013-03-30T23:23:42.293-07:002013-03-30T23:23:42.293-07:00Such a fair and comprehensive argument!Such a fair and comprehensive argument!Harbhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16687402760635664323noreply@blogger.com